If you can have a “capsule” wardrobe, stripped down to only the most basic items, can you do the same for your home?
The first answer which popped into my head was that you do more in your home than you do in a given piece of clothing, functionally anyway. Clothes you wear — that’s it. A home you sleep, read, eat, prepare food, garden, play, etc. If you take only 10 pieces of clothing (excluding underwear and outerwear) as your “limit” or 20 if you have winter like we do, then why not 10 items per verb in the list I just made?
So what do you need, minimum to sleep? (static: bed) changing pieces: sheets (2) pillow, pillow case and blanket. Absolute minimum = 5 for one person, 1 pillow, for 2 people and two pillows, add 2 or 7. With real seasons, double it = 14
What do you need, minimum to read? A book or tablet, ideally, you don’t have to own any of these you can rent them or take them out of the library.
What do you need, minimum to eat? Food and utensils, as needed. If you think about it, you don’t need anything to eat a banana, but eating stew without utensils would be difficult! So, the answer for this one is that “it varies.” Not very successful in terms of trying to be minimalist.
I’m going to mull this notion over a bit.
I’m helping someone learn English. In doing so, I’ve been trying to find the language “short cuts” first. There aren’t many things in English which are always true, but some are. This is a working adult person, not a kid.
The living and stuff thing needs a similar approach. What are the things which are always true, that you always need? Do that FIRST.
We’ll see how it works out with stuff, here.
It seems to me that a beginning can be made by using Maslow’s heirarchy of needs, again. This:
The bottom layer is what your home is about.
Food/eating, water/drinking, warmth and rest are at least some of those basics, so is security and safety. When you add the psychological needs things get more complex.
So, I’m going to make some assumptions:
- I’m only talking about STUFF here.
- That emotional reactions to STUFF aren’t part of the equation.
- The security here is physical security only.
Given those parameters, I’m off to write some notes and thoughts.